|
|
|
Antarctic Ice Shelf In Peril as Bridge Snaps |
Go to original
Monday 06 April 2009
by: Michael Vincent
The
Wilkins Ice Shelf in Antarctica is in the final stages of collapse and
scientists are concerned the event shows climate change is happening
faster than previously thought.
An ice bridge, up to 40 kilometres long but at its
narrowest just 500 metres wide, was thought to be holding the giant
shelf to the Antarctic continent, but it recently snapped.
From above, parts of the Wilkins Ice Shelf now look like giant panes of shattered glass.
British Antarctic Survey glaciologist Professor David
Vaughan has been monitoring the Wilkins Ice Shelf for some time with
the help of satellite imagery.
"The ice shelf has almost exploded into a large number, hundreds of small icebergs," he said.
"The images on the European Space Agency website show that the ice bridge was relatively stable for the past month or two.
"In fact, we visited the ice bridge - we landed on it with
an aircraft and put a GPS, a satellite positioning system, onto the ice
shelf. And that's another way we've been monitoring its movements over
the last few weeks."
Researchers believe the ice bridge was an important barrier, keeping the rest of the ice shelf in place.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Ice-Free Arctic Ocean Possible in 30 Years, Not 90 as Previously Estimated |
Go to original
Friday 03 April 2009
by: ScienceDaily
A
nearly ice-free Arctic Ocean in the summer may happen three times
sooner than scientists have estimated. New research says the Arctic
might lose most of its ice cover in summer in as few as 30 years
instead of the end of the century.
The amount of the Arctic Ocean covered by ice at the end of
summer by then could be only about 1 million square kilometers, or
about 620,000 square miles. That's compared to today's ice extent of
4.6 million square kilometers, or 2.8 million square miles. So much
more open water could be a boon for shipping and for extracting
minerals and oil from the seabed, but it raises the question of
ecosystem upheaval.
While the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in 2007
assessed what might happen in the Arctic in the future based on results
from more than a dozen global climate models, two researchers reasoned
that dramatic declines in the extent of ice at the end of summer in
2007 and 2008 called for a different approach.
Out of the 23 models now available, the new projections are
based on the six most suited for assessing sea ice, according to Muyin
Wang, a University of Washington climate scientist with the Joint
Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean based at the UW,
and James Overland, an oceanographer with the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration's Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory in
Seattle. Wang is lead author and Overland is co-author of a paper being
published April 3 by the American Geophysical Union's Geophysical
Research Letters.
Wang and Overland sought models that best matched what has
actually happened in recent years, because, "if a model can't do
today's conditions well, how can you trust its future predictions?"
Wang says. Among the models eliminated were those showing too little
ice or too much compared to conditions that have occurred.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
The protesters are the ones we should listen to at this summit |
|
Go to Original
The way out of the credit and the climate crunch is the same - a Green New Deal
When this
hinge-point in human history is remembered, there will be far more
sympathy for the people who took to the streets and rioted than for the
people who stayed silently in their homes. Two global crises have
collided, and we have a chance here, now, to solve them both with one
mighty heave – but our leaders are letting this opportunity for
greatness leach away. The protesters here in London were trying to
sound an alarm now, at five minutes to ecological midnight.
Many commentators seemed bemused that the protesters focused on the
climate crunch as much as the credit crunch. What's it got to do with a
G20 meeting on reviving the global economy? Why wave banners saying
'Nature Doesn't Do Bail-Outs' today? Because both crises have their
roots in the same ideology – and both have the same solution.
We
are facing a collapsed economy and a rapidly warming world because an
extreme ideology has dominated world affairs for decades. It is the
belief that markets aren't just a useful tool in certain circumstances;
they are an infallible mechanism for running human affairs. If the
economy ebbs, the market will put itself right by punishing
wrong-doers. If the climate begins to unravel, business will rectify
its own behaviour voluntarily. Now we know how well this market
fundamentalism works.
The climate is currently going the same
way as the banks. Last month, the world's climate scientists gathered
in Copenhagen to explain we are facing "devastating consequences" – not
in some distant future, but in my lifetime and yours. Unless we swerve
fast, we are soon going to hit global temperatures that no human being
has ever lived through. We don't have much time. By 2015, we will have
belched so much carbon into the atmosphere that we will cross the Point
of No Return: the climate will start to unravel as all its natural
cooling processes break down one by one, guaranteeing we become hotter
and hotter. Once we hit an increase of 4 degrees, much of the world
will become uninhabitable, and there will be vast wars for what remains.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
US Carbon Emissions Trading Core of Clean Energy Bill |
Go to original
Tuesday 31 March 2009
by: Environment News Service
Washington
DC - Congressional Democrats today released clean energy legislation
that establishes a market-based cap-and-trade program for reducing
global warming pollution from electric utilities, oil companies, and
factories that together are responsible for 85 percent of U.S.
greenhouse gas emissions.
Henry Waxman of California, who chairs the House Energy and
Commerce Committee and Edward Markey who chairs the Energy and
Environment Subcommittee introduced a discussion draft of the American
Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, or ACES, which they say charts a
new course toward a clean energy economy.
"This legislation will create millions of clean energy
jobs, put America on the path to energy independence, and cut global
warming pollution." said Chairman Waxman. "Our goal is to strengthen
our economy by making America the world leader in new clean energy and
energy efficiency technologies."
"This legislation will create clean energy jobs that can't
be shipped overseas, reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and make
America the global leader in energy technology," said Chairman Markey,
who has held many hearings on the major issues in the bill.
Markey said, "We will create jobs by the millions, save
money by the billions, and unleash energy investment by the trillions."
"Chairman Waxman and I will work with our colleagues to
ensure that we are protecting American consumers and that our clean
energy future helps all parts of the country," he said.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Obama Team Pushes New Role for US in Climate Change Talks |
Go to original
Sunday 29 March 2009
by: Dina Cappiello
Washington - At its first negotiations on climate change, the Obama administration
is trying to persuade other countries that the United States does care about
global warming and wants to shape an international accord.
After eight years on the sidelines, the United States says it is ready for
a central role in developing a new agreement to slash greenhouse gases. But
whether the country, which is the second-largest source of heat-trapping pollution,
is ready to sign onto a deal by year's end could depend on Congress.
The State Department sent climate envoy Todd Stern to Bonn, Germany, for the
first of a series of largely technical meetings that begin today. The talks
are intended to lay the groundwork for an agreement to be signed in December
in Denmark.
Stern, in a telephone interview Thursday from London, said it was important
for him to "make the first statement on behalf of the United States and
say we're back, we're serious, we're here, we're committed, and we're going
to try to get this thing done."
Yvo de Boer, executive secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention
on Climate Change, which is hosting the Bonn talks, said participants "will
be very excited" to hear Stern outline the basic principles that will guide
the United States.
Other countries are expecting a new tone after the Bush administration made
clear its disdain for any climate discussions aimed at securing a commitment
to mandatory greenhouse gas reductions.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Sydney to Egypt - Lights Dim for Earth Hour |
Go to original
Sunday 29 March 2009
From landmarks to homes, idea is to send message about global warming.
From an Antarctic research base and the Great Pyramids of Egypt
to the Empire State Building in New York, illuminated patches of the
globe went dark Saturday for Earth Hour, a campaign to highlight the
threat of climate change.
Time zone by time zone, nearly 4,000 cities and towns in 88
countries joined the event sponsored by the World Wildlife Fund to dim
nonessential lights from 8:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. The campaign began in
Australia in 2007 and last year grew to 400 cities worldwide.
Organizers initially worried enthusiasm this year would
wane with the world focused on the global economic crisis, said Earth
Hour executive director Andy Ridley. But he said it apparently had the
opposite effect.
"Earth Hour has always been a positive campaign; it's
always around street parties, not street protests, it's the idea of
hope, not despair. And I think that's something that's been incredibly
important this year because there is so much despair around," he said.
Crowds in Times Square watched as many of the massive
billboards, including the giant Coca-Cola display, darkened. Steps
away, the Majestic Theater marquee at the home of "The Phantom of the
Opera" went dark, along with the marquees at other Broadway shows.
Mikel Rouse, 52, a composer who lives and works nearby came
to watch what he called "the center of the universe" dim its lights.
"C'mon, is it really necessary? ... All this ridiculous
advertising ... all this corporate advertising taking up all that
energy seems to be a waste," Rouse said.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Earth Hour 2009 -- March 28th, 2009 -- 8:30 pm |
|
|
EPA Says Global Warming a Public Danger |
Go to original
Monday 23 March 2009
by: H. Josef Hebert
Washington - The White House is reviewing a proposed finding by the Environmental
Protection Agency that global warming is a threat to public health and welfare.
Such a declaration would be the first step to regulating carbon dioxide and
other greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act and could have broad economic
and environmental ramifications. It also would likely spur action by Congress
to address climate change more broadly.
The White House acknowledged Monday that the EPA had transmitted its proposed
finding on global warming to the Office of Management and Budget, but provided
no details. It also cautioned that the Obama administration, which sees responding
to climate change a top priority, nevertheless is ready to move cautiously when
it comes to actually regulating greenhouse gases, preferring to have Congress
act on the matter.
The Supreme Court two years ago directed the EPA to decide whether greenhouse
gases, especially carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels, pose a threat public
health and welfare because they are warming the earth. If such a finding is
made, these emissions are required to be regulated under the Clean Air Act,
the court said.
"I think this is just the step in that process," said White House
Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, noting the Supreme Court ruling. Another White
House official, speaking anonymously in deference to Gibbs, predicted "a
long process" before any rules would be expected to be issued on heat-trapping
emissions.
But several congressional officials, also speaking on condition of anonymity
because the draft declaration had not been made public - said the transmission
makes clear the EPA is moving to declare carbon dioxide and other greenhouse
gases a danger to public health and welfare and views them as ripe for regulation
under the Clean Air Act.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
| | << Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
| | Results 197 - 224 of 951 |
|
|
That's about how much time is left for us to get our act together. |
|
|