|
Peak Oil
|
The Current Oil Shock: No Relief in Sight |
|
|
|
Go to Original
Tuesday 15 July 2008
by: Dilip Hiro, TomDispatch.com
When
will it end, this crushing rise in the price of gasoline, now averaging
$4.10 a gallon at the pump? The question is uppermost in the minds of
American motorists as they plan vacations or simply review their daily
journeys. The short answer is simple as well: "Not soon."
As yet there is no sign of a reversal in oil's upward price
thrust, which has more than doubled in a year, cresting recently above
$146 a barrel. The current oil shock, the fourth of its kind in the
past three-and-a-half decades, and the deadliest so far, shows every
sign of continuing for a long, long stretch.
The previous oil shocks - in 1973-74, 1980, and 1990-91 -
stemmed from specific interruptions of energy supplies from the Middle
East due, respectively, to an Arab-Israeli war, the Iranian revolution,
and Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. Once peace was restored, a
post-revolutionary order established, or the invader expelled, vital
Middle Eastern energy supplies returned to normal. The fourth oil
shock, however, belongs in a different category altogether.
Nothing Like It Before
Unlike in the past, the present price spurt has been caused
mainly by global demand for energy outstripping available supply.
Alarmingly, there is no short-term prospect that supply will match
demand. For a commodity like petroleum that underwrites and permeates
every aspect of modern life - from fuel to fertilizers, paints to
plastics, resins to rubber - "balance" requires a 5% safety factor on
the supply side.
At present, however, spare capacity in the oil industry is
less than 2%, down from more than 6% in 2002. As a result, the price of
oil responds instantly to negative news of any sort: a threat against
Iran by an Israeli cabinet minister, a fire on a Norwegian offshore
drilling rig, or an attack on an oil facility by armed rebels in
Nigeria.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
G8 Ministers Vow New 'Green' Efforts |
|
|
|
Go to Original
Monday 09 June 2008
by: The Associated Press
Aomori, Japan - Faced with record-high oil prices, the world's leading economies
and oil consumers have pledged greater investment in energy efficiency and green
technologies to control their spiraling thirst for petroleum.
In a joint statement, energy ministers from the Group of Eight countries -
joined by China, India and South Korea - also urged oil producers to boost
output, which has stalled at about 85 million barrels a day since 2005, and
called for cooperation between buyers and producers.
But with little prospect for a production surge soon, the focus of Sunday's
meeting in Japan was on what wealthy nations should do to rein in consumption,
while reducing carbon emissions blamed for global warming.
"We also have to address too the demand side of the equation," said
John Hutton, Britain's business secretary. "We will do that through new
measures to improve energy efficiency (and) accelerate our moves to a new, low-carbon
form of energy generation."
The 11 nations account for 65 percent of the world's energy consumption and
face record-high oil costs. Prices gained 8 percent Friday to US$138.54 on the
New York Mercantile Exchange.
Energy experts say most producers have little ability to expand output. The
exception is Saudi Arabia, which could increase output by about 2 million barrels
a day.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
New Fears on Long-Term Global Oil Supplies |
|
|
|
Thursday 22 May 2008
Go to Original
by: Graham Bowley and David Jolly, The International Herald Tribune
Oil and gas prices continue to skyrocket as oil production limits become clear.
Worries that world oil demand will outstrip global supplies intensified on
Thursday, sending ripples through the global economy as oil prices leaped above
$135, a new record high.
The price spike occurred overnight, and by Thursday morning oil had fallen
back slightly to $132.87, down 30 cents from its close on Wednesday.
But the leap capped a rally that has seen oil rise nearly $5 a barrel in two
days, underscoring the dire implications of the current price run-up for businesses
across the globe.
Ford Motor Company, the American auto manufacturer, said on Thursday it would
cut vehicle production for the rest of this year and fall short of reaching
profitability in 2009, a long-held company goal. In a statement, a top Ford
executive said rising gasoline prices "are having a tremendous impact on
our sales, our manufacturing operations and our profitability."
Meanwhile, Europe's biggest airline, Air France-KLM, warned of a profound reshaping
of the world airline industry caused by what it called the "explosion"
in the price of oil. And American Airlines said on Wednesday that it would slash
flights and begin charging passengers to check bags, part of a company effort
to cut costs in the face of skyrocketing fuel prices.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Read more of Kelpie Wilson's columns
By Kelpie Wilson
t r u t h o u t | Environment Editor
Saturday 17 May 2008
In 1956, M. King Hubbert, a petroleum geologist with Shell Oil, presented a
paper to the American Petroleum Institute that predicted US oil production would
peak in the early 1970s and then follow a declining curve, now known as Hubbert's
curve. But Hubbert almost didn't get to give his paper. He got a call from his
bosses at Shell, who asked him to "tone it down." His reply was that
there was nothing to tone down. It was just straightforward analysis. He presented
the paper, unedited. You can read the whole story here.
Since that time, the oil industry and its political supporters have done everything
they can to tone down the message that oil is a finite resource and that we
will run out of it some day. Why would they do that? To further the short-sighted,
short-term pursuit of profit. In 2004, Shell finally got caught in a lie about
the size of its oil reserves. The company had inflated the stated size of its
oil reserves to keep stock share prices high because who wants to invest in
a company - or an industry - that is going the way of the dinosaurs?
Since 1956, the world economy has proceeded under a sort of oil company spell
that has woven the illusion all around us that oil depletion is so far into
the future that we don't need to worry about it. That belief was essential to
support the aim of an endlessly growing economy.
There have been a few hitches in that strategy. In 1972, just as oil production
in the United States reached its all-time peak, a group of computer modelers
from MIT released a study called "The Limits to Growth." They predicted
a steep decline in natural resources of all kinds. Because reserve numbers for
many minerals, including oil, were not accurately known back then, they looked
at different scenarios. Some showed us running out of oil before 2000 and some
showed the peak occurring toward the middle of the 21st century.
The pro-growth faction reacted quickly and scathingly to the idea that there
could be limits to growth. The MIT scientists were treated like Cassandras in
academia and in the press.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Oil Running Out as Prime Energy Source: World Poll |
|
|
|
|
Go to Original
By Deborah Zabarenko
Reuters
Monday 21 April 2008
Washington
- Most people believe oil is running out and governments need to find
another fuel, but Americans are alone in thinking their leaders are out
of touch with reality on this issue, an international poll said on
Sunday.
On
average, 70 percent of respondents in 15 countries and the Palestinian
territories said they thought oil supplies had peaked. Only 22 percent
of the nearly 15,000 respondents in nations ranging from China to
Mexico believed enough new oil would be found to keep it a primary fuel
source.
"What's
most striking is there's such a widespread consensus around the world
that oil is running out and governments need to make a real effort to
find new sources of energy," said Steven Kull, director of
WorldPublicOpinion.org, a global research organization that conducted
the poll.
Concerns
over climate change, which is spurred by emissions from fossil fuels
including oil, also were a factor among respondents, Kull said.
The
current tightening of the oil market is not temporary but will continue
and the price of oil will rise substantially, most respondents said.
"They
think it's just going to keep going higher and a fundamental adaptation
is necessary," Kull said in a telephone interview.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Experts: Oil Is a Slippery Situation |
|
|
|
|
Go to Original
By John Colson
Post Independent
Saturday 29 March 2008
Clock ticking on the world's supply.
Aspen
- Experts might disagree about exactly when the world will run out of
the oil that is easily found and extracted, but most agree that it will
happen at some point and that humanity should be preparing for that
day.
That
was one of the messages to come out of the second full day of The Aspen
Institute and National Geographic Magazine Aspen Environment Forum, at
a panel discussion featuring energy-efficiency guru Amory Lovins, green
technology specialist Randy Udall, and Marvin Odum, executive
vice-president of Shell Oil. The forum concludes today.
The
three took part in a wide-ranging discussion that centered around the
concept that "peak oil" is approaching rapidly, moderated by Jack Riggs
of The Aspen Institute.
What is peak oil?
Udall,
former head of the Community Office for Resource Efficiency in Aspen
and Carbondale, noted that the world is cranking out about 80 million
tons of carbon dioxide every 24 hours, a statistic that has focused the
world's attention on global warming from greenhouse gases such as
carbon dioxide.
"We're focused on the smoke," Udall said of the issue. "Let's think about the fire."
He
said that in order to produce that much carbon dioxide, the world must
be burning approximately 30 million tons of oil, coal and natural gas
per day, which he said translates into roughly 140 pounds per week, per
person, globally.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
| |
|
|
As U.S. citizens, we have a special responsibility. Though we make up just 5 percent of the world's population, we produce 25 percent of total greenhouse gas emissions. What can you do? Go ZeroCarbon for just $8.25 per month to offset your entire climate impact -- including all of the indirect carbon emissions caused by purchasing products such as clothes, food, your iPod, everything -- and Working Assets will offset an extra 5 tons FREE!!! |
|
|