|
|
Peak Oil
|
Key Oil Figures Were Distorted by US Pressure, Says Whistleblower |
|
|
|
|
Go to Original
Terry Macalister, Guardian UK Monday 09 November 2009
Exclusive: Watchdog's estimates of reserves inflated says top official. The world is much closer to running out of oil than official estimates admit, according to a whistleblower at the International Energy Agency who claims it has been deliberately underplaying a looming shortage for fear of triggering panic buying. The senior official claims the US has played an influential role in encouraging the watchdog to underplay the rate of decline from existing oil fields while overplaying the chances of finding new reserves. The allegations raise serious questions about the accuracy of the organisation's latest World Energy Outlook on oil demand and supply to be published tomorrow – which is used by the British and many other governments to help guide their wider energy and climate change policies. Read more about the potential innacuracy of the latest World Energy Outlook on oil demand and supply by clicking here. (In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. h o t g l o b e has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is h o t g l o b e endorsed or sponsored by the originator.) |
|
The Era of Xtreme Energy: Life After the Age of Oil |
|
|
|
Go to original
Tuesday 22 September 2009 by: Michael Klare Tom Dispatch: Introduction Talk about roller-coaster rides: the price of a barrel of crude oil, which was still under $20 the week after September 11, 2001, made it to $147 in July 2008, just before the global economic meltdown, only to hit a low of $32.40 early this year. And yet, in recent months, hardly noticed, it's crept back above $70 -- and this with "recovery" barely on the horizon and global industrial demand still muted at best. And that's the good news. Surely, as economic activity picks up, oil demand will rise and prices will resume their upward march. And don't be fooled by a spate of announcements, as recently in the Gulf of Mexico, of new oil discoveries, as Michael Klare, author of the invaluable book Rising Powers, Shrinking Planet, indicates. If there is a surge in industrial demand globally, recent discoveries will have little impact on the growing supply of energy. "It's still the one," energy expert Daniel Yergin says of oil in the current issue of Foreign Policy magazine. Yergin, author of a classic history of oil, The Prize, claims that petroleum will dominate the global energy equation for decades to come. Look elsewhere and you can find sprightly scenarios for energy futures based on climate-friendly renewable energy sources. As Klare makes painfully clear, however, there's a third way -- and that is distinctly not good news. We are going to enter an age of Xtreme energy, he suggests, and the last-ditch efforts to keep our world on its normal course are likely to devastate the environment, accelerate climate change, inflict widespread pain, and create global conflict. It's not a pretty picture. Tom Michael T. Klare | The Era of Xtreme Energy: Life After the Age of Oil By Michael T. Klare The debate rages over whether we have already reached the point of peak world oil output or will not do so until at least the next decade. There can, however, be little doubt of one thing: we are moving from an era in which oil was the world's principal energy source to one in which petroleum alternatives -- especially renewable supplies derived from the sun, wind, and waves -- will provide an ever larger share of our total supply. But buckle your seatbelts, it's going to be a bumpy ride under Xtreme conditions. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
The Current Oil Shock: No Relief in Sight |
|
|
|
Go to Original
Tuesday 15 July 2008
by: Dilip Hiro, TomDispatch.com
When
will it end, this crushing rise in the price of gasoline, now averaging
$4.10 a gallon at the pump? The question is uppermost in the minds of
American motorists as they plan vacations or simply review their daily
journeys. The short answer is simple as well: "Not soon."
As yet there is no sign of a reversal in oil's upward price
thrust, which has more than doubled in a year, cresting recently above
$146 a barrel. The current oil shock, the fourth of its kind in the
past three-and-a-half decades, and the deadliest so far, shows every
sign of continuing for a long, long stretch.
The previous oil shocks - in 1973-74, 1980, and 1990-91 -
stemmed from specific interruptions of energy supplies from the Middle
East due, respectively, to an Arab-Israeli war, the Iranian revolution,
and Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. Once peace was restored, a
post-revolutionary order established, or the invader expelled, vital
Middle Eastern energy supplies returned to normal. The fourth oil
shock, however, belongs in a different category altogether.
Nothing Like It Before
Unlike in the past, the present price spurt has been caused
mainly by global demand for energy outstripping available supply.
Alarmingly, there is no short-term prospect that supply will match
demand. For a commodity like petroleum that underwrites and permeates
every aspect of modern life - from fuel to fertilizers, paints to
plastics, resins to rubber - "balance" requires a 5% safety factor on
the supply side.
At present, however, spare capacity in the oil industry is
less than 2%, down from more than 6% in 2002. As a result, the price of
oil responds instantly to negative news of any sort: a threat against
Iran by an Israeli cabinet minister, a fire on a Norwegian offshore
drilling rig, or an attack on an oil facility by armed rebels in
Nigeria.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
G8 Ministers Vow New 'Green' Efforts |
|
|
|
Go to Original
Monday 09 June 2008
by: The Associated Press
Aomori, Japan - Faced with record-high oil prices, the world's leading economies
and oil consumers have pledged greater investment in energy efficiency and green
technologies to control their spiraling thirst for petroleum.
In a joint statement, energy ministers from the Group of Eight countries -
joined by China, India and South Korea - also urged oil producers to boost
output, which has stalled at about 85 million barrels a day since 2005, and
called for cooperation between buyers and producers.
But with little prospect for a production surge soon, the focus of Sunday's
meeting in Japan was on what wealthy nations should do to rein in consumption,
while reducing carbon emissions blamed for global warming.
"We also have to address too the demand side of the equation," said
John Hutton, Britain's business secretary. "We will do that through new
measures to improve energy efficiency (and) accelerate our moves to a new, low-carbon
form of energy generation."
The 11 nations account for 65 percent of the world's energy consumption and
face record-high oil costs. Prices gained 8 percent Friday to US$138.54 on the
New York Mercantile Exchange.
Energy experts say most producers have little ability to expand output. The
exception is Saudi Arabia, which could increase output by about 2 million barrels
a day.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
New Fears on Long-Term Global Oil Supplies |
|
|
|
Thursday 22 May 2008
Go to Original
by: Graham Bowley and David Jolly, The International Herald Tribune
Oil and gas prices continue to skyrocket as oil production limits become clear.
Worries that world oil demand will outstrip global supplies intensified on
Thursday, sending ripples through the global economy as oil prices leaped above
$135, a new record high.
The price spike occurred overnight, and by Thursday morning oil had fallen
back slightly to $132.87, down 30 cents from its close on Wednesday.
But the leap capped a rally that has seen oil rise nearly $5 a barrel in two
days, underscoring the dire implications of the current price run-up for businesses
across the globe.
Ford Motor Company, the American auto manufacturer, said on Thursday it would
cut vehicle production for the rest of this year and fall short of reaching
profitability in 2009, a long-held company goal. In a statement, a top Ford
executive said rising gasoline prices "are having a tremendous impact on
our sales, our manufacturing operations and our profitability."
Meanwhile, Europe's biggest airline, Air France-KLM, warned of a profound reshaping
of the world airline industry caused by what it called the "explosion"
in the price of oil. And American Airlines said on Wednesday that it would slash
flights and begin charging passengers to check bags, part of a company effort
to cut costs in the face of skyrocketing fuel prices.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Read more of Kelpie Wilson's columns
By Kelpie Wilson
t r u t h o u t | Environment Editor
Saturday 17 May 2008
In 1956, M. King Hubbert, a petroleum geologist with Shell Oil, presented a
paper to the American Petroleum Institute that predicted US oil production would
peak in the early 1970s and then follow a declining curve, now known as Hubbert's
curve. But Hubbert almost didn't get to give his paper. He got a call from his
bosses at Shell, who asked him to "tone it down." His reply was that
there was nothing to tone down. It was just straightforward analysis. He presented
the paper, unedited. You can read the whole story here.
Since that time, the oil industry and its political supporters have done everything
they can to tone down the message that oil is a finite resource and that we
will run out of it some day. Why would they do that? To further the short-sighted,
short-term pursuit of profit. In 2004, Shell finally got caught in a lie about
the size of its oil reserves. The company had inflated the stated size of its
oil reserves to keep stock share prices high because who wants to invest in
a company - or an industry - that is going the way of the dinosaurs?
Since 1956, the world economy has proceeded under a sort of oil company spell
that has woven the illusion all around us that oil depletion is so far into
the future that we don't need to worry about it. That belief was essential to
support the aim of an endlessly growing economy.
There have been a few hitches in that strategy. In 1972, just as oil production
in the United States reached its all-time peak, a group of computer modelers
from MIT released a study called "The Limits to Growth." They predicted
a steep decline in natural resources of all kinds. Because reserve numbers for
many minerals, including oil, were not accurately known back then, they looked
at different scenarios. Some showed us running out of oil before 2000 and some
showed the peak occurring toward the middle of the 21st century.
The pro-growth faction reacted quickly and scathingly to the idea that there
could be limits to growth. The MIT scientists were treated like Cassandras in
academia and in the press.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
| |
|
WC is a media org comprised of a global network of independent journalists, designers and thinkers inspiring readers around the world with stories of the most important and innovative new tools, models and ideas for building a bright green future. |
|
|