|
Go to Original
By Craig McInnes
The Vancouver Sun
Thursday 01 May 2008
Victoria, Canada - Ouch.
Ouch, ouch.
That,
in short, pretty much sums up the reaction from across the province to
the carbon tax announced by Finance Minister Carole Taylor in her
budget in February and finally introduced as legislation this week.
British
Columbians are starting to read the fine print on the revenue-neutral
guarantee, which promises to cut a dollar of other taxes for every
dollar raised by the new carbon tax, and are discovering that neutral
for the provincial treasury doesn't mean they won't be feeling any
pain.
What
galls is the apparent inequity: Islanders complain about having to pay
more for ferry service due to rising fuel costs. Northerners feel
singled out because of longer winters and the distances they drive.
Truckers complain they are being driven to the brink.
It's
the kind of reaction that usually sends politicians scurrying for their
bunkers from which they can be expected to emerge with a basket full of
loopholes to make everyone happy.
They
know voters who feel unfairly singled out for pain have long memories.
But to the surprise of many, the legislation introduced by Taylor this
week offered no such relief, nor could it without losing all
credibility.
The
complaints didn't spark an ordinary political response because the
Carbon Tax Act isn't an ordinary tax bill. It's not designed to raise
money for the government, it is designed to change behaviour. It's
supposed to hurt.
The
carbon tax is a fiscal trip to the woodshed for energy consumers. A
painful experience that we're told is for our own good.
The idea is that you can control how the tax affects you through the choices you make.
Products
and activities that are less harmful to the environment become less
expensive and harmful choices cost more. Harm is defined as the release
of carbon dioxide and other gases that scientists believe are fuelling
destructive climate change.
So
you can keep on driving that SUV, but you will pay more for the
privilege. Carbon taxes reward green living. Energy pigs get butchered.
But
here's the catch. Although we see the carbon taxes directly being
applied to gas, home heating oil and other forms of fuel, we will feel
its effects in almost every facet of life. You may not have any choice
but to pay more.
It
won't just be ferry users; homeowners will face a bigger tax bite to
pay for increased fuel costs paid by local governments.
Consumers
of all kinds of goods and services will pay more to cover the increased
costs that businesses pays for heat, light and shipping.
Those
unhappy truckers will face a crunch in the short term, but eventually
their higher costs will simply be passed on to consumers.
How
much more? We'll find out. The point is that this is what putting a
price on carbon looks like. Generally speaking, the greater the energy
content, not just of the item itself, but of everything that goes into
to it, the more it will cost.
The
size of the carbon tax being introduced this year is more of a slight
nudge than a boot in the backside. The strategy is to start low and
increase it slowly over the next several years.
But
the skyrocketing price of oil has overtaken the tiny-steps approach.
The carbon tax being imposed in July will be 2.4 cents a litre of gas.
Since the tax was announced in February, the price of gas has jumped by
about 10 times that much with the carbon tax still to come.
That
jump - with predictions that there may be even more pain ahead - should
reinforce the message the carbon tax is designed to deliver.
It
will also hopelessly complicate any analysis of what effect, if any,
the tax is having on the B.C. economy, or for that matter on the lives
of British Columbians.
Still,
what matters more over time is the consistent message that
manufacturers are starting to get, the message that consumers will be
trying to beat the carbon tax - and new price shocks from soaring oil
prices - by buying energy-efficient products.
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. h o t g l o b e has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is h o t g l o b e endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
|