Go to Original
Sunday 07 September 2008
by: Alister Doyle, Reuters
Oslo
- A new set of United Nations laws may be needed to regulate new Arctic
industries such as shipping and oil exploration as climate change melts
the ice around the North Pole, legal experts said on Sunday.
They said existing laws governing everything from fish
stocks to bio-prospecting by pharmaceutical companies were inadequate
for the polar regions, especially the Arctic, where the area of summer
sea ice is now close to a 2007 record low.
"Many experts believe this new rush to the polar regions is
not manageable within existing international law," said A.H. Zakri,
Director of the U.N. University's Yokohama-based Institute of Advanced
Studies.
Fabled shipping passages along the north coast of Russia
and Canada, normally clogged by thick ice, have both thawed this
summer, raising the possibility of short-cut routes between the
Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.
Dozens of legal experts are meeting in Iceland from
September 7-9 to debate the legal needs of the polar regions. Other
threats include a surge in tourism, with 40,000 visitors to Antarctica
in 2007 against just 1,000 in 1987.
Many legal specialists believe there is a lack of clarity
in existing laws about shipping, mining, sharing of fish stocks drawn
northwards by the melting of ice, and standards for clearing up any oil
spills far from land.
"Oil in particular and risks of shipping in the Arctic are
big issues. It's incredibly difficult to clean up an oil spill on ice,"
said conference chairman David Leary of the Institute of Advanced
Studies, which is organizing the conference with Iceland's University
of Akureyri.
"The question is: do we deal with it in terms of the
existing laws or move to a new, more global framework for the polar
regions?" he told Reuters.
"Severe" Conditions
Some experts say the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea
is unclear, for instance, when it speaks of the rights of states to
impose restrictions - such as compulsory pilots for ships - off their
coasts in "particularly severe climatic conditions" or when ice covers
the sea for "most of the year."
With the ice receding fast, defining what conditions are
"particularly severe" could be a problem, said law professor Tullio
Scovazzi of the University of Milano-Bicocca.
Leary said the eight nations with Arctic territories - the
United States, Russia, Canada, Norway, Sweden, Iceland, Denmark and
Finland - have so far preferred to limit discussion to existing
international laws.
The WWF environmental group is among those urging a new
U.N. convention to protect the Arctic, partly fearing that rising
industrial activity will increase the risk of oil spills like the Exxon
Valdez accident off Alaska.
"We think there should be new rules, stricter rules. We are
proposing a new convention for the protection of the Arctic Ocean,"
said Tatiana Saksina of the WWF.
Alaska's state governor Sarah Palin, Republican vice
presidential candidate in November 4's U.S. election, is an advocate of
oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
A boom in tourism in Antarctica meanwhile risks the
accidental introduction of new species to an environment where the
largest land creature is a flightless midge.
Bio-prospecting may also need new rules. Neural stem cells
of Arctic squirrels could help treat human strokes, while some Arctic
fish species have yielded enzymes that can be used in industrial
processes.
(Editing by Catherine Evans.)
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. h o t g l o b e has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is h o t g l o b e endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
|