Go to Original
Thursday 11 September 2008
by: Jeff Barnard, The Associated Press
Grants
Pass, Oregon - A group of forest scientists from the United States and
Europe reports that a growing body of evidence settles an old question
over whether old growth forests store more carbon dioxide from the
atmosphere than they release.
Based on a review of research from more than 500 forest
sites around the world, the answer, published Thursday in an online
edition of the journal Nature, is that most forests between 15 and 800
years old do, and the total amounts to about 1 billion metric tons a
year, or about 10 percent of the net carbon uptake worldwide.
Co-author Beverly Law, a professor of global change forest
science at Oregon State University, said the findings argue for
including credit for preserving old growth forests in the Kyoto
Protocol and cap-and-trade schemes for controlling greenhouse gas
emissions blamed for global warming.
"If you have an old forest on the ground, it's probably
better to leave it there than to cut it," she said. "For the countries
that did sign on to Kyoto, it is suggesting that perhaps they need to
consider unmanaged primary forests in their carbon accounting."
The United States did not sign the Kyoto agreement.
"The absolute amount of carbon stored in these forests is
significant," Law said from her office in Corvallis. "Once you disturb
them by logging or fire, there is carbon loss. When that occurs, there
is material left on site that decomposes. And some is lost in the
manufacturing process."
At U.N. talks last month in Accra, Ghana, aimed at a new
global warming treaty, delegates agreed that countries should be
compensated for slowing or halting deforestation, and that countries
where forests have largely been depleted should be rewarded for
conserving and expanding their forest cover.
About 30 percent of the world's forests have not been
significantly logged, and about half of that is in the boreal and
temporal forests of the Northern Hemisphere, Law said. The review
estimated that 1.3 billion metric tons, plus or minus 500 million
metric tons, of carbon are absorbed by these forests annually.
The conventional wisdom for the last 40 years, based on one
study of a young plantation forest, has been that old growth forests
were carbon neutral, giving up as much from decomposition and gases
released from the trees as they drew out of the atmosphere during
photosynthesis, Law said.
Law is science chair of the AmeriFlux network of some 100
forest research sites around the country that measure carbon
absorption, including one outside Sisters, Ore.
Those sites and a similar network known as CarboEurope have
been finding since the 1990s that once most forests get more than 15
years old they absorb more carbon dioxide than they release, and
continue doing so for centuries, she said. It just took several years
to compile the research.
Ram Oren, a professor of forest ecology at Duke University
also involved in the AmeriFlux network, said the evidence has been
mounting for years showing forests are net carbon sinks, but this is
the first time he has seen a total calculated.
"This represents the acknowledgment of something that the
scientific community has already been sharing for awhile, that the old
paradigm is incorrect," Oren said from his office in Durham, N.C. "Now
lets see the impact of it," on greenhouse gas policy.
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. h o t g l o b e has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is h o t g l o b e endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
|